Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole local authority · 2025

Deprivation in context

17.5

IMD 2025 deprivation score (higher = more deprived).

169th most deprived of 296 district-level authorities

Also: 42nd least deprived of 153 upper-tier authorities

Deprivation score (Index of Multiple Deprivation 2025) · Persons, All ages

England: 21.8 · 2025

healthcards · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · 2025

What this means

In 2025 Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole ranked 169th most deprived of 296 district-level authorities, with an IMD score of 17.5 against an England average of 21.8. In the separate upper-tier comparison, it ranked 42nd least deprived of 153 upper-tier authorities. The Index of Multiple Deprivation blends income, employment, education, health, crime, housing and the living environment.

Primary comparison: Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole is 169th most deprived of 296 district-level authorities. Separate upper-tier comparison: 42nd least deprived of 153 upper-tier authorities.

Recorded value (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole)

2025: 17.5

Share this card

Share a link or download an image to post or send. Each image includes the area, reporting period, statistic and source.

/bournemouth-christchurch-and-poole/cards/imd-2025

Source & provenance

Indicator:: Deprivation score (Index of Multiple Deprivation 2025) (ID 94240)
Source:: MHCLG, English Indices of Deprivation 2025
Area:: Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole (E06000058), Upper-tier local authority (post Apr 2023)
Period:: 2025; retrieved 2026-10-13 (distinct from reporting period)
Population:: Persons, All ages
Note:: Population-weighted average of small-area scores.

View source ↗

Caveats

A composite score, not a rate — it has no confidence interval and no single-year trend.
Averages across each local authority hide wide differences between its neighbourhoods.
The prominent rank is the official MHCLG rank of average score among 296 district-level authorities where the area's boundary appears in that table. The separate 153-place comparison uses upper-tier authorities.
County councils contain several district-level authorities, so no single 296-place district rank applies to a whole county; those cards use the upper-tier comparison only.
Ranks 1–70 are worded most deprived; ranks 71–153 are reversed and worded least deprived. This is a display convention, not an official deprivation category.
Higher score means more deprived. Stated factually, not as judgement.

Missing or suppressed values are never shown as zero — every card above passed validation with a real numeric value.