New STI diagnoses per 100,000, excluding chlamydia in people aged 24 and under.
55th highest STI diagnosis rate of 153 upper-tier authorities
New STI diagnoses excluding chlamydia in people aged 24 and under · Persons, All ages
England: 441.2 · 2025
healthcards · Kirklees · 2025
What this means
Kirklees recorded 393.7 new STI diagnoses per 100,000 residents in 2025 — 1,763 diagnoses. The measure excludes chlamydia diagnoses in people aged 24 and under.
Huddersfield is a town, not a statistical area: these figures are for Kirklees local authority as a whole (which includes Huddersfield, Dewsbury, Batley and surrounding towns). Treat them as the wider-area picture, not street-level results.
Source denominator: 447,847 residents. This is a crude diagnosis rate, not age-standardised; diagnoses are not unique people.
England: 441.2 per 100,000. Diagnosis rates also reflect access to testing and testing activity, so this is not a simple league table of infection prevalence.
Share this card
Share a link or download an image to post or send. Each image includes the area, reporting period, statistic and source.
/huddersfield/cards/sti-diagnoses
Source & provenance
Indicator:
New STI diagnoses excluding chlamydia in people aged 24 and under (ID 91306)
Source:
UK Health Security Agency surveillance systems via OHID Fingertips
Area:
Kirklees (E08000034), Upper-tier local authority (post Apr 2023)
Period:
2025; retrieved 2026-10-14 (distinct from reporting period)
Excludes chlamydia diagnoses in people aged 24 and under; it is not a count of every new STI diagnosis.
Higher diagnosis can reflect more infection, more testing, better access to services, or a combination of these.
People can receive more than one diagnosis, so the count is diagnoses rather than unique people.
95% confidence interval: 375.5 to 412.5 per 100,000.
Derived from the published point estimates for 153 upper-tier authorities with data. Exact ties share a rank. Overlapping confidence intervals mean nearby ranks may not be meaningfully different.
A lower diagnosis rate is not automatically better because access to testing and testing activity affect the measure.
Missing or suppressed values are never shown as zero — every card above passed validation with a real numeric value.